Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 6000 words

Assignment Examplename infringes on the use of the trademark name, a person other than the proprietor of the trademark should be able to continue to use the domain name.1 In addition to this, The Domestic Trademark Law allows users to register domain name that resemble a specific trademark, on condition that the goods and the services provided are different, which is the case of Canadian Crafts Connexion Inc. Moreover, the Canterbury Crafts Connection Company has a registered United farming trademark for CanCraftsConnexCo., not for Cancraftsconnex. Even if the English company would try to combat this argument with the fact that these two trademarks seem confusingly similar, CCC has the possibility to make out this by mentioning that for the purposes of the UDRP confusion is not of great importance.Another element that the Canterbury Crafts Connection Company must prove in order to force CCC to spate over their domain name is the lack of rights or legitimate footings of the defen dant in the challenged domain name. In this case, I would advise CCC to demonstrate this please by appealing to the entire name of the company Canadian Crafts Connexion Inc. and explaining the necessity of using the shortened name for the website. Therefore, CCC has a legitimate reason in this domain name, which allows it, under the law provisions, to preserve this name.Regarding the first request, the defamatory character of the painting must be established in order to run into whether it is defamatory or not. There is no exact legislation in Canada that would clarify this question therefore, it is necessary to make analogies between the internet communications and the communications made via media. Publication or dissemination to a third party is essential to proving defamation. Posting the painting online means making it available and communicating the ascertains message to everybody. This raises the following legal issue does the internet communication fall under the provisi ons of the Libel and